printable version email article
K-12
Brainwashing
By Ari Kaufman--FrontPageMagazine.com--11/04/05
It is no longer a secret that many public and private
universities are populated by professors who use their classrooms to recruit
students to their political agendas. But while the politicization of the
universities is now common knowledge, an even more distressing instance of this
abuse is to be found in the nation’s K-12 schools.
I have that on good authority. I have been a
teacher in Los Angeles-area elementary and middle schools and have witnessed
first hand how students who are younger and more impressionable are being
regularly indoctrinated by leftwing teachers. Having worked in a number of
different school districts over the past five years, from the well-to-do
Palisades to the hardscrabble
One such case involved a
substitute teacher of my acquaintance. During his various stints at our school,
he was notorious for compelling elementary-school students to sign random
petitions in support of the political causes he favored. He wasn’t shy about
foisting his views on other teachers, either. Once, when my classroom’s
American flag accidentally fell, he immediately stuffed it into the closet.
And, in a sense, who could blame him? Seeing that three quarters of our faculty
were declining to recite the daily pledge with their students he had probably
concluded that mistreating the flag would not be frowned upon.
In indoctrinating
students in his politics, he was by no means an anomaly. I can vividly recall
the greeting of a grade school colleague last Columbus Day, as the bell for
morning class rang. “Hey, Mr. K, Happy Murdering of Indigenous people Day!”
Then he said: “I'll tell my kids the real
It was the same story at
a middle school in a more affluent part of
School assemblies were
arguably the most blatant forums for political indoctrination. By my rough
estimate, 80 percent of these were focused on promoting an environmentalist
agenda. It wasn’t enough to encourage elementary school students to recycle.
No, the kids had to endure sermons on the supposed wickedness of humanity,
especially corporate humanity. An over-the-top presentation by a yoga
instructor was representative of the genre. After showing pictures of dead
animals, meant to symbolize the victims of environmental depredation, she led
the children in a mournful chant expressly aimed at stirring their emotions.
“How does the seal look?” she would intone. “Sad!” they would echo. When I
voiced my concerns about the patently exploitative demonstration to another
teacher, she concurred. Nonetheless, she insisted on keeping her concerns to
herself. She had a point: objecting to the assembly might prove unpopular with
the faculty, not a few of whom were radical environmentalists and Green Party
members.
In a similar vein,
consider the presentation made by a college theater group from UCLA. Showing no
interest in a balanced engagement with the issues, the group instead staged a
20-minute play whose theme can be summarized thusly: Once upon a time, the
Earth was beautiful. Then humans came and destroyed it. To appreciate the
effect of such simplistic narratives on students, consider the reaction of a
little girl in my classroom. Visibly upset, she approached me after the play to
ask: “Are we really ruining the Earth”? I did my best to explain, as
objectively as possible, that the reality was a bit more complicated that the
play would have her believe. But this had little effect.
In case the assemblies
proved inadequate to steeping the kids in environmentalist dogma, there were
also field trips designed to achieve the same end. The preferred field trip of
most teachers was something called “Ocean Day. Organized by the Malibu
Foundation, a non-profit group whose declared mission is “creating
conservationists” out of school children, it was annual day set aside for
environmental activism, or as it is euphemistically called, “in-school environmental education.”
The point of the annual
trip was to clean up trash on
Environmentalist
indoctrination is not the only problem in our public schools, however. It is
not uncommon, for instance, for teachers to put their political commitments
ahead of their teaching responsibilities. One such incident occurred at a
school in
Upon her return, she
regaled the faculty with her “protest” stories. Proudly displaying a picture
from her stint in jail, she announced sarcastically, “this is
our democracy at work!” She later had to miss more school in order to
fly back to
What does draw
faculty and administrative attention on campus is anything that expresses
a contrary or conservative point of view. Indeed, experience has taught me that
a culture of intimidation obtains in our public schools. The case of one of
teacher I knew provides an illuminating example. A 20 year veteran at the
school, he had long hidden the fact that he supported the Republican Party,
fearing, not without justice, that this would do him irreparable damage. The
fact that his son was serving in
Besides him, there were
only two other Republicans at my school: myself and a friend of mine. Both
young and idealistic educators, we had not yet been apprised of the unspoken
rule against challenging the school’s political culture. We learned the hard
way last spring, when we published an article in the Orange County Register supportive of Governor Schwarzenegger and
critical of the powerful Los Angeles Teacher’s
The reaction at the
school was as swift as it was severe. Formerly friendly teachers now refused
even to acknowledge our presence; the convivial chatter ceased. One outraged
teacher wondered how anyone could support Republicans,
much less say a word against the teachers unions. (The evils of the Republican
Party, on the other hand, were received wisdom; an African-American teacher who
spotted a photograph of Condoleezza Rice in my classroom exclaimed, “That’s so racist!’) My skepticism about the teachers’ policy
of leaving the school promptly at 2:30, part of the union-organized protest
against the governor’s education policies, only added more tarnish to my
reputation.
Ultimately, it was the
teachers’ insistence on putting their own agendas ahead of the students that
led me to resign my teaching post. It was bad enough that teachers neglected
students in order to stick it to the Republican governor, that nearly a quarter
of the faculty spent weekends at union rallies, marching alongside
pro-terrorist organizations like International A.N.S.W.E.R., and that they
believed as an article of faith that, as one teacher put it, “you can't be a
teacher and also be a Republican.” But when it was announced this fall $8 would
be subtracted from our salaries to fund campaigns against Governor
Schwarzenegger’s reform initiatives, I resigned my teaching position out of
principle.
Looking back on it now, I
see that I was a poor fit for the public schools. While I love teaching, it has
become clear to me that educational progress must take a back seat to the
“progressive” political agendas of the teachers. I guess I had my priorities
backwards.
Ari Kaufman is a writer living in Washington D.C. He
blogs at Partial Transcripts.